Mythbuster Monday: Spurs Should Be Attached to the Stirrups
On Mythbuster Monday, we tackle a variety of equestrian myths to either bust or confirm. Today’s discussion: Should you have your spurs attached to your stirrups?
It’s Mythbuster Monday, where Horse Nation dives into different equestrian myths and provides research-based evidence to either bust or confirm those myths. Today’s topic: Should your spurs be attached to your stirrups? Does it make your riding posture more correct? Is the pressure applied differently from the stirrups than from the backs of your boots? Read more to find out!
Myth: Spurs should be attached to the stirrups
Myth or Fact: Both
Canva/CC
Spurs are metal tools used by horseback riders to aid in directing and controlling the horse with subtle leg movements. They usually consist of a small, curved or straight neck that ends in a rowel (a small, rotating wheel) or a blunt nub. Spurs work by applying gentle pressure to the horse’s sides, encouraging it to move forward, turn, or adjust its gait. Although spurs can be effective communication aids, they must be used with care, precision, and proper training to avoid discomfort or harm to the horse.
The main difference between English and Western spurs lies in their design and use. English spurs tend to be more minimalist, often featuring a small, blunt end or a smooth rowel. They are typically used in disciplines like dressage or show jumping. Western spurs, on the other hand, often have larger, more decorative rowels and longer necks. They’re used in Western riding styles like reining, cutting, or trail riding. While both types serve the same basic purpose, their styles reflect the traditions and needs of their respective riding disciplines.
But is it more effective for the horse and rider to have spurs connected to the stirrups?
Canva/CC
The Cowboy Arts and Gear Museum states that in eastern cultures the spur is usually connected to the stirrup rather than the foot. This method is still being used, especially in Greece. The practice likely originated from Persian influence due to this culture riding in traditional slipper-like footwear rather than boots. The slippers could not support a foot mounted spur.
Charles De Lacy’s “The History of the Spur” examines the spur’s evolution, focusing on its design modifications and their practical implications for riders. Throughout history, spurs have undergone gradual changes, with riders and craftsmen introducing alterations to improve functionality and comfort. One significant development discussed in the book is the integration of the spur with the stirrup. The design innovation aimed to enhance the rider’s ability to apply precise pressure to the horse’s sides, thereby improving control and communication. By attaching the spur directly to the stirrup, the rider could activate it effortlessly with minimal movement, allowing for more subtle and effective cues. De Lacy notes that such modifications were often adopted incrementally, with some riders embracing the changes while others remained loyal to traditional designs. These adaptations reflect a continuous quest for greater harmony between rider and horse, balancing practicality with the evolving art of horsemanship.
Canva/CC
FEI Para Equestrians allow riders to use spurs attached to the stirrup considering this a compensating aid. The idea is to allow the rider to use this style spur to compensate for physical or sensory limitations resulting from their impairments. However, compensating aids is not to be used to compensate for lack of riding skill or to aid in enhancing the horse’s performance. There is a fine line using this style spur between using it as compensating aid versus a training aid. Because the style of spur is so effective, it should only be used with riders with poor control of their lower limbs.
Canva/CC
According to Naylor’s Equestrian, spurs connected the boot are the most common and effective for the purpose of backing up cues asked by the rider. They’re similar to that of the spurs attached to the stirrup in that they allow the rider to give more subtle cues that can be almost invisible. With either design, an unstable lower body will jab the shank of the spur into the horse potentially causing the horse to be irritated, distracted, or annoyed. Improper use, no matter the design can be dangerous.
Canva/CC
After diving into the research, each rider should pick the style of spur setup that is best for the rider and horse. While Greece and other eastern countries prefer the spur to be mounted to the stirrup, many riders in other parts of the world prefer a spur that is attached to the boot.
